American Eulogy
AdminThe essay below was written by Ryan Painter, a prosecuting attorney for the State of Indiana. While the essay violates several, if not all, of the Rules of The Only Orthodoxy, the Administration has decided to publish it as an excellent example of the sense of one side of the culture war in which this country and the world are embroiled, particularly the besieged outrage felt by social conservatives generally. The Administration encourages posters to focus discussion not on the content of the essay itself, but rather on the the climax of culture-clash this essay demonstrates so clearly.
Obama is a suave salesman, peddling “hope” and “change.” The problem–from my perspective–is that he doesn’t just propose a change from the Bush way of doing things, he proposes a change from the historical American way of doing things. I feel as though the American public has become so entranced listening to Barry hawk “money for this and money for that,” that they’ve forgotten that it’s their money he’s spending.
More importantly (or ominously), Barry and the Democratic goon squad licking their chops in the wings (e.g. Nancy Pelosi) will spend as much cultural capital on their policies as they will dollars, and impose a debt worse than anything denominated in greenbacks. I’m only 30, and yet the America I see today is hard to recognize as the place of my youth. I can’t imagine how my parents or grandparents must feel. I’m not against change, when it’s warranted and leads to something positive. But I am against change for change’s sake. And, I am most definitely against change when it means the breakdown of the culture and way-of-life I’ve grown accustomed to.
I worry that the socialism I see on the horizon will be long lasting and become institutionalized just like SS, Welfare, or Medicare. I worry that the exploding number and cost of entitlements will sap what’s left of this nation’s vitality and drive, as it’s done in Europe. I worry that the unique traditions of this country, forged from the struggles of our people and our history, will become diluted and warped by the foreign traditions of invading immigrants and Euro-centric elitists. My girlfriend has shown me the PC anti-patriotic garbage that poses for teaching material in modern public schools, and I shudder to think of the effect it has on young people. By contrast, India and China are brimming with hundreds of millions of well-educated, self confident young people who love their country, their culture, and believe–not without good cause–that the world is their oyster, that this century will be Asia’s century. God that I were a Chinaman, I would be taught love of country rather than shame of country.
But China and India didn’t elect Barry Obama, we did. This nation of chronic mortgagers has just bought into the biggest and possibly most disastrous mortgage of all, with an adjustable rate from Hell. We’ve elected a man that will throw out the good with the bad in the name of unthinking, unrecognizing, discompassionate, inexorable CHANGE. The relentless march of regulation, centralization, taxation, cultural relativism, redistribution, deficit spending, and entitlement–all the shameful and nasty drugs our nation has grown so addicted to–now seems unstoppable. The federal government, already too damn powerful, threatens to intrude as never before in the ordinary lives of our people.
Consider: Americans will write out their mortgage checks to Uncle Sam; local schools will get their marching orders from the Department of Mis-Education; radio stations will be “Pravda-ized,” made mouthpieces of Lefty babble in lieu of thoughtful conservative discourse; American industry, crippled by the economic downturn, is finding itself easy pickings for a predatory government eager to chain our companies to unions and then choke them with savage, punitive taxes; our Supreme Court, lackadaisical bulwark of the American Way that it has been over the years, will find itself sorely tested by a myriad of Lefty laws and regulations designed to meddle in people’s every day business and utterly dominate the day-to-day life of our nation; the Judeo-Christian tradition, bedrock of our national values and very existence as a nation, will find itself about as welcome in American political discourse as occultism–perhaps less so–while Lefty politicians [appease] the noisy Islamic minority and propose new and ever more insidious ways to defecate on our most sacred and deeply-felt beliefs; and the list grows on, limited only by the infernally clever imagination of the Lefty bunch. The proud American man, a trusty and self reliant fellow, ferocious if roused but dutiful and generous otherwise, will find–is finding–himself brought to heel by chronic unemployment, over-taxation, government-sponsored besmirchment of his thoughts and ways on the vindictive alter of “cultural sensitivity,” and a paternalistic social system that seeks to strip him of his dignity and independence and shackle him–dehumanized and broken–to the business end of our corrupt entitlement “programs.”
America, you’ve voted to abandon everything decent thing you ever stood for. What comfort will it be to you, that we’ve replaced our proud national ethos of hard work and fair play, our can-do “don’t tread on me” philosophy, with a shabby welfare state and national schizophrenia? Our leaders, spineless and fearful of their own shadows, have promised the security and comfort of a babe in the womb, and you bought in. And to what heights of national grandeur can a child in the womb aspire? Assuming, of course, that we don’t vote to abort ourselves….or have we already? How very low are our dreams, how shallow our goals. We had a good run, I suppose, 150 years of “damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead.” Patrick Henry is turning over in his grave; we had liberty, and we voted to give it back. Not because of fear, or foreign pressure, or even civil discord, but because we no longer had the will or the discipline to defend it. We foreclosed on Freedom and walked away.
I believed in America. I believed in the American people. I believed in the basic goodness of America, of its people, and even of its government. I believed in American exceptionalism. I believed there was a special place for us on this Earth, to protect what was good and teach right from wrong, to set an example and serve as a beacon of hope to the shiftless masses suffering under despots and tyrants. Now we ourselves have elected one, in the form of a Party. And I am heartbroken.
On November 4, 2008, David Guipe and Matthew Schwartz, and millions of their fellows, roused briefly from their apathy by one last gasp of civic duty, went to the polls and voted for Barack Obama. In that final tragic moment America voted to commit suicide. America, R.I.P. 1776 - 2008. We will never forget you.

November 7th, 2008 at 10:34 pm
Wow. I amazed at the amount of anger in this post. I think the instructions at the beginning of this post are good–there’s probably some useful things to be said about how the sides feel in the “culture war.”
The author’s anger seems to come from this assumption that losing the election is the same as losing the culture war. I’m not sure that’s really true. Look at California–on the same day Obama was elected, Californians amended their constitution to outlaw gay marriage!! I understand that all the “America is dead” melodrama in the essay is just anger talking, but it’s unjustified anger.
I’m interested to see how this impotent rage so to speak plays out as Obama takes office with a majority Congress that may allow him to lead the charge on creating cultural change in America. I think the next year will tell us whether this kind of outrage from social conservatives like this author is unfounded or just premature.
November 7th, 2008 at 10:44 pm
If you look at the specific things the author is angry about–big government, big spending, the rise and dominance of an entitlement culture–he ought, by rights, to have been every bit as angered by a McCain victory. Senator McCain was no friend to the small-government, socially conservative ideology this author holds in such high and emotional regard. It’s fascinating that even though this author has identified with precision the values he believes are critically important, he still presumes that the GOP candidate is preferable even when the GOP candidate is no friend to any of those values.
Another thing worth noting about this is that the author equates his traditionalist, small-government, rosy-lensed view of the recent American past as the “real” America that Obama will hijack and destroy. Now, I believe and have written that it is certainly possible to identify a uniquely American ideal that Obama appears to disagree with. But so does our current president, and so does McCain. It’s extremely interesting to me that this author, who is a fair representation of the growing far-right resentment of the Obama revolution, claims that “his” America has only now died. If Mr. Painter’s America is dead, it is our last three presidents that killed it. His rage is late, not early.
November 8th, 2008 at 1:40 am
I’m late to the comment party. I was going to make the same point about the George W. Bush presidency. In the same way that only Nixon could go to China during the Cold War, only a Republican could grow government as massively and intrusively as Bush has over the past eight years. It’s only a slight exaggeration to say that Bill Clinton was a devoted disciple of Thomas Jefferson in comparison to our current president.
Another aspect of Obama’s election that Mr. Painter doesn’t address is the distastefulness of the GOP alternative. As Jeremy observed, John McCain is at least as much in favor of large, activist government as Barack Obama. The campaign finance reform he championed has done more to muzzle political free speech than Wilson’s Sedition and Espionage Acts. The comprehensive immigration he favors is furiously opposed by a majority of American citizens, including an overwhelming majority of rank-and-file Republicans. The man himself was unable to supply any kind of unifying theme to his candidacy beyond his biography, and is famously uninterested in policy details.
After having a man with disturbingly similar faults run the American ship aground over the past eight years, it is understandable — if, in my opinion, regrettable — that millions more Americans turned to Barack Obama instead of to John McCain. And millions of others, like me, turned to neither and voted for change — that is, a third party candidate.
The America Mr. Painter laments has generally not been a dominant force on the national stage for at least a generation. And both major parties have been complicit in keeping it offstage as much as possible.
November 8th, 2008 at 1:43 am
Sorry, I meant to say that the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform legislation has done more to muzzle free speech than anything since Wilson’s Sedition and Espionage Acts. McCain-Feingold, though terrible from a First Amendment perspective, is nowhere near as bad as Woodrow Wilson’s fascist regime during WWI.
November 8th, 2008 at 6:31 am
I agree with you Paul. Now here’s the real question–if the author has had cause to be outraged for a long time, why is it only now that he (and many, many others whom his essay fairly represents) realizes it, and speaks out about it in such dramatic form?
November 8th, 2008 at 11:45 am
**I want to apologize for the length of this comment up front, but I have several points to make.**
I can’t speak to Mr. Painter’s motivations. I will venture an opinion here, however, and say that it seems that many conservatives experiencing similar bouts of rage and despair are doing so now because they no longer have to carry George Bush’s water.
One of the worst things to happen to the GOP and American Conservatism over the past eight years was their choice to completely associate themselves with George W. Bush. Only twice in eight years have they explicitly defied him — on the Harriet Miers Supreme Court nomination and the McCain-Kennedy immigration reform bill. On virtually every other major initiative of the Bush administration — the radical increase in spending, the unprecedented ballooning deficit and massive accumulation of debt, the trillion dollar Medicare prescription drug entitlement, the invasion and endless occupation of Iraq, the broad invasions of privacy involved in the Patriot Act and the wireless wiretapping regime — conservatives and rank-and-file Republicans have either largely remained silent about, or (more often) actively and stubbornly supported, policies which they would have fought tooth and nail had they been proposed by a President Gore or a President Kerry.
I don’t think I’m saying anything particularly controversial or biased when I state unequivocally that George W. Bush has left America markedly worse off than when he found it in late January, 2001. The extent to which conservatives were actively complicit in the processes that left America in such bad shape is disturbing. Out of (what I feel was excessive, and even misplaced) loyalty to their commander and chief, they mostly said nothing as he pursued policies which were clearly bad for the country. Perhaps now conservatives, freed from their need to support their leader, finally feel free to criticize the government and have suddenly realized how critical the state of America currently is.
Maybe one day they will achieve enough critical distance to be able to lay the proper (lion’s) share of blame at Mr. Bush’s feet for the changes that have brought America to this place. Now, however, I think that they (rightly, in my opinion) fear what an Obama administration will do to America, and may be projecting their horror at what has happened to America onto the President-elect because they are currently unable to emotionally distinguish between the present real horrors that have been perpetrated by George Bush and the future possible horrors which may be perpetrated by Barack Obama.
This is, to be fair, armchair psychoanalyzing of the rankest kind. I may be way off base. I feel much more justified, however, in saying that eight years under George W. Bush and an Animal Farm-level of intellectual interaction amongst themselves and with the opposition (”Four legs good, two legs bad!”), of reflexively justifying nearly everything done by the Bush administration and reflexively demonizing nearly everything done by the Democrats, have left many conservatives with atrophied critical thinking capabilities. It will take them some time for them to rebuild their abilities to make more nuanced and self-critical arguments. During that time, unreflective emotional outbursts against what “the Liberal Democrats have done to this country” may be common as they process through what many of them helped Bush do over the past eight years.
I have no idea whether Mr. Painter is among this group. What I do know is that a large number of people are (at least one-fifth of Americans, according to President Bush’s approval numbers), and that their feelings are likely very similar to those expressed in this essay.
November 8th, 2008 at 4:50 pm
The GOP has certainly lost sight of many of the ideals it was supposed to champion over the last decade. I will not be surprised if the Obama victory and increased presence of the Democratic party in Congress will be the best thing to happen to the GOP in a long, long time. It should serve to re-focus the priorities of the party and will allow its members time to get on the same page as far as how to realize their goals. Perhaps after 20+ years of unabashed federal expansion, a re-dedicated GOP will be appropriately positioned to rescue the economy, and an ‘actually’ conservative GOP, as Mr. Painter laments, will return. That is of course assuming that no changes are enacted with effects too fundamentally disturbing to the concept of democracy which could not be undone. Assuming Mr. Obama is not the last President of the United States of America (emphasis on either President or United States)…
November 8th, 2008 at 6:24 pm
Another, and simpler possibility–in the vein of armchair psychoanalysis–is that Republicans have kept their frustrations with Bush quiet, and now have an internally appropriate target for eight years of anger.
November 8th, 2008 at 9:47 pm
Benjamin, I think you’re underestimating both the extent to which the conservative brand has been tarnished by Bush’s administration and the effects of conservatives’ complete identification with Bush over the past eight years. It will take significantly longer than 4 or even 8 years to overcome both. Even if an Obama administration does terrible things to America, they will have to become very terrible indeed for Americans to quickly forget how badly Republicans ran the federal government under Bush.
Also, I don’t, in the next four or eight years, how much Republicans will be able to 1) accept how much of the current state of things is their fault or 2) change the ways of thinking that they got used to during Bush’s two terms. Given how much chatter there is on sites like National Review and conservative blogs about how McCain lost for the same reasons the GOP lost Congress in 2006 — namely, that he was insufficiently conservative and didn’t go after earmarks as much as he should have — I think it will be a while before conservatives come to terms with the reasons for (what is currently shaping up to be) their long political exile.
Of course, I don’t know that Democrats (by which I mean the Democratic Congressional leadership) ever really figured out why they were tossed out in 1994. It might be that they’re in the position of the Republicans in 1920 — without a firm plan, but beneficiaries of intense public disgust with the ruling administration and it’s party. It’s instructive that after the terrible things Wilson and the Democrats did to the country — especially during and after WWI — that Republicans ruled for the next ten years, only losing power nationally because of the Great Depression. Will disgust with the colossal mismanagement of the Bush administration lead to a similar reign for the Democrats this time, or will the sinking economy be so bad as to drag down Obama and the Democrats with it? Only time will tell.
November 16th, 2008 at 12:28 pm
Maybe its because I’m old enough to remember Carter and have voted against Clinton twice to think everybody needs to calm down. I’ve heard all this before from the GOP most recently in 1992. Paul, you think that it will take longer than 4 or 8 years for the conservatives to overcome 8 years of Bush. However, when Clinton was elected in 1992 and had control of both houses, it took Republicans exactly two years to win control of the Senate and also the House, the latter for the first time in decades. And that was when we only had Limbaugh - long before the days of Hannity, Beck and Coulter. There can be no bigger disgrace than Watergate and what happened - we were out of the White House for one term and then God smiled on us and blessed us with 8 years of the Great Communicator.
Looking across the aisle, in 2004 the Democrats really should have been able to run a bag of frozen peas against Bush and win but somehow they blew it. How long did it take them to recover? 1 election cycle - two years for Congress and 4 for the Presidency.
These things are always cyclical. Like the Jews in the book of Judges, every once in a while the party in power has to be reminded how they got power in the first place to get them back in track. Just like no one sounded taps for the Democrats when Kerry lost, now is no time to sound the death knell for the GOP. I would have been much more worried for the future of the Republican Party had McCain won. There’s no reaosn to play nice now.
November 16th, 2008 at 10:16 pm
Thank you, Keith. The perspective you supply is welcome. I don’t have any personal loyalty to the GOP, and if the party were to collapse I wouldn’t necessarily mourn its passing. I don’t think that’s what will happen, but I’m wondering if this latest round of incompetence, mismanagement, and betrayal of trust in the White House represents a greater problem than the GOP has faced in a while.
Watergate was terrible, but it only stained the GOP by association. Senator Goldwater told Nixon he only could guarantee 15 GOP votes against removal in the Senate, and the GOP in the House was obviously going to vote for impeachment before Nixon resigned. The Republicans at large obviously weren’t complicit with the high crimes committed by CReEP, the Saturday Night Massacre, or any of the other terrible things Nixon and his cronies did. Such is not the case this time around. The GOP was absolutely complicit with every problem of the Bush administration, every act of public malfeasance, every incompetent bungling of critical situations. It’s hard for the GOP to run away from Bush on this one. It might be that the Democrats won’t be able to hold onto power because of the severity of the economic crisis (since they’ll be the ones left holding the bag next January). But maybe the public’s memory will be longer than that. Who knows?
November 16th, 2008 at 11:18 pm
As Bill Lumbergh says, I’m going to have to go and disagree with you there. Watergate plus the pardoning of Nixon makes the current GOP seem downright angelic. And as far as the GOP not supporting Nixon, it’s the rats off a sinking ship theory rather than any sort of altruistic display of conscience. There’s also the difference between supporting a president on policy, even if its bad policy (Bush) and supporting a criminal.
Just because a Democratic presidential candidate picked up a majority of the popular vote for the first time since Jimmy Carter rolled to a 50.1% victory over non-elected Gerald R. Ford, does not mean lights out for the Grand Old Party. I wouldn’t necessarily mourn the passing of the GOP as it is currently structured, but as a Sam’s Club, as opposed to a Country Club, Republican, I would mourn the passing of the party of Lincoln, the good Roosevelt, and Reagan.