The Dinner Party: an allegory
Paul GoodellAuthor’s note: Today, I’ve written something a little different. This is an allegorical one-act play based on the reaction to Pope Benedict XVI’s September, 2006 speech on Islam. Some characters stand for individuals, while others represent nations or groups of people.
Setting: A dinner party at Angie’s swanky big city apartment. The guests continue to arrive and are mingling before dinner is served.
** The doorbell rings. Angie opens the door and greets a middle-aged man who looks vaguely Middle-Eastern. **
Angie: Mo! I’m so glad you could make it.
Mo: I wouldn’t miss a party like this, Angela. Who’s here?
Angie: All of my friends. Please, come in. ** speaking to everyone ** Everybody! Everybody! You know my good friend, Mo.
** The guests give Mo friendly smiles and waves. **
Angie: You simply must meet everyone, Mo. Here is my neighbor, Pierre.
** She brings Mo over to talk with a very well dressed man in the near corner of the room. He has a glass of red wine and strong French accent. **
Angie: Pierre, this is my friend, Mo. He’s recently in town from visiting his family in Morocco.
Pierre: Bonjour, Mo.
Mo: Hello, Pierre.
Pierre: Morocco, eh? Sounds very exotic. My family used to own land near there years ago, I think. Beautiful area.
** Pierre and Mo engage in a very lively conversation, while other guests react to Mo’s presence. **
Jack: ** in a sarcastic tone ** Oh good, Mo’s here. Just nobody make him angry and we’ll have a good time.
Libby: What do you mean? Mo’s a great guy. I know some of his family and they’re all very nice.
Jack: ** defensively ** Yes, yes. Of course. I was just joking, of course. Just a joke.
Ben: Well, Libby, Mo certainly can be nice, when he wants to.
Libby: “When he wants to”? What is that supposes to mean?
Ben: Well, it’s really quite simple. Mo has an anger problem. He always has. It’s why he does so many violent things.
Libby: What? How can you say something like that? That’s terribly judgmental.
Ben: Well, that’s what the record seems to show. It certainly seems to be the truth.
Libby: That’s just your interpretation of the record, you mean.
Connie: I’d have to agree with Ben, Libby. Just look at Mo’s actions. When he enters a house he’s usually fine for a while, but then he hears something that sets him off and he just makes a scene. He punched a wall and smashed a window over at Jack’s house last year, and you don’t want to know the things I’ve heard that he does in his own house.
Libby: ** to Jack ** Did he really punch a wall at your house?
Jack: Well … yes … I guess he did. But it really wasn’t his fault. It was a lovely party, but then Sam told a joke that Mo thought was off-color. He politely asked Sam to stop but he didn’t stop, and Mo became upset and started yelling at him, and I suppose he got a little carried away and hit the wall and threw that chair through the window. It was all understandable, though. I don’t have to tell you that I immediately asked Sam to leave. We couldn’t have any more episodes like that, and Mo did ask him very politely to stop telling his joke.
Connie: But don’t you think that Mo’s behavior was inappropriate?
Jack: Some people might call it “inappropriate”, but I’d rather not judge people like that.
** The doorbell rings, and Angie opens the door. It’s Sam. **
Sam: Hi Angie. Sorry I’m late.
Jack: ** under his breath ** Oh Christ. Who invited him?
Connie: ** quietly, to Jack ** I thought you and Sam were good friends?
Jack: Well, I suppose we used to be. But lately he’s said and done a lot of things that I just can’t accept.
Connie: And Mo hasn’t?
Libby: Well, Mo is a different case, obviously.
** Connie opens his mouth to respond, but Sam comes over to talk with them and their private conversation stops. **
Sam: Hi guys.
Connie: Hi, Sam.
Jack: ** with a frozen smile ** Hello.
Libby: ** looking uncomfortable ** Hi.
Sam: Did I interrupt something?
Jack: ** hastily ** No, no. Not at all.
Connie: Actually, we were just talking about Mo. He’s over there in the corner talking with Pierre.
Sam: Oh. ** He glances over to the corner and sees Mo and Pierre talking. ** Mo. I see. I think I’ll go get myself a drink. Would anyone like something?
Connie: Yes, thank you. I’ll have a 7-and-7.
Libby: Another glass of chardonnay, please.
Sam: Jack, Ben? Anything?
Jack: Uh, no thank you. I still have to finish my merlot.
Ben: ** chuckles ** A stein of Lowenbrau would be nice. But if they don’t have that, I suppose I’ll take some cabernet.
Sam: Alright. 7-and-7, chardonnay, and cabernet. Got it.
** Sam goes to the wet bar. Mo comes over after Sam leaves. **
Mo: ** nodding his head in greeting ** Jack, Libby.
Jack: Hello Mo.
Libby: Mo, how have you been?
Mo: Excellent. Morocco was beautiful.
Libby: That’s wonderful.
Mo: So, I hear you were talking about me.
Jack: Talking about you? My friend, we haven’t said a word about you.
Mo: So no one said anything about an anger problem I have?
Jack: Anger problem? Where did you hear anything about an anger problem?
Mo: One of Pierre’s friends mentioned it to me. He said that Ben and Connie were talking about your party a while back where Sam told that disgusting joke.
Jack: Ah, yes. That. I believe someone did mention that. I told them, of course that it was not your fault. Sam should not have been telling jokes like that.
** Sam comes back from the wet bar with the drinks. **
Sam: I shouldn’t have been telling jokes like what?
Mo: Like that filthy joke you told at Jack’s party. I won’t even repeat it. It was disgusting.
Sam: Hey Mo, listen, the joke wasn’t that bad. I’m sorry if you were offended, but it wasn’t that bad.
Mo: Yes it was! It was horrible!
Libby: ** nervously ** There’s no need to shout, Mo. Sam apologized. It’s okay, right?
Mo: ** grudgingly ** Yeah, alright. I guess. ** He glares at Sam, who glares back. **
Jack: Well, then. That should do it. You know, I think I’ll have another drink now. ** He walks briskly to the wet bar. **
Ben: ** whispering to Connie ** This is exactly what I was talking about.
** Connie nods **
Mo: ** very quietly ** What? What did you say?
Libby: ** glaring at Ben and Connie out of the corner of her eye ** Nothing, Mo. It was nothing.
Connie: No, Libby, someone has to say something. Ben’s right. I think this shows that you have a real anger problem, Mo.
Mo: ** his eyes go wide and his face becomes red ** I have a … How dare you say something like that. How dare you! I don’t have an anger problem! Alright? I don’t! Have! An anger! Problem! Do you understand? ** He shoves Ben. ** Do you?!
Libby: ** Yelling at Sam, Connie, and Ben ** You see what you did? This is all your fault! Why can’t you people ever act civilized? God, you always have to start these fights.
** Angie and Pierre quickly comes over. **
Angie: What’s going on? Mo – why are you yelling?
Mo: It’s not my fault, Angie. ** Pointing at Ben ** He was telling lies about me. What was I supposed to do?
Angie: Ben? What did you say?
Ben: I just said that Mo has an anger problem, Angie. That was it.
Connie: It’s the truth, Angie. Anyone can see it. I’m surprised he hasn’t punched in any walls yet.
Mo: What?!
** He lunges at Connie, but Sam, Jack, and Pierre restrain him. **
Mo: ** pushing Sam away ** Don’t touch me!
Angie: Mo, I think you should leave.
Mo: What? Me leave? Why?
Libby: That’s unfair, Angie. Mo wouldn’t have done anything if Ben and Connie hadn’t said anything. They’re really responsible for Mo’s behavior. Them and Sam for the joke he told before. They’re the ones who should leave. ** To Ben ** You should apologize for making Mo angry, Ben. It was wrong of you to say anything.
Jack: Libby’s right, Angie. It’s really their fault.
Pierre: Yes, Angie. They’re quite right.
Angie: I’m sorry. Maybe they shouldn’t have said anything, but Mo, you have to act more civilized. You can’t start yelling and pushing people when they say something you don’t like. You need to go.
** Jack and Libby look shocked and appalled. Mo looks furious. He puts on his coat and turns to leave. **
Mo: I can’t believe this! I don’t have an anger problem!! You’re a bigot, Angie. You and Sam and Ben and Connie. You’re all liars and hateful bigots! You all should be careful. If I see any of you outside here I’m going to kill you!
** Mo stomps out of the apartment and slams the door. **
Now, the questions I’d like to ask are: Who do you think would normally be at fault here? and, How do you think the people in the play should have reacted?

January 4th, 2008 at 5:41 pm
Hi Paul.
I liked this essay. I must say, I found all of the characters mildly unappealing! It seemed none of them were really friends, so why’d they even bother going to the party?
January 6th, 2008 at 1:27 pm
I was taking an OB/GYN practical-exam, and I had a pro-life pin on my coat (the two little feet), and one of the patient-actors (who happened to be pregnant) asked me ‘what’s that pin?!’ and proceeded to angrily berate me for the remaining five minutes, saying things like ‘I can’t believe they let you people into this institution.’ Meanwhile, I was supposed to be examining her, and was being watched on video camera. Later, the clerkship director told me that perhapas I was responsible for this, and that I had provoked her by choosing to wear such a pin. I flatly denied the accusation, saying that there are dozens of other innocent reasons to wear a pin.
Provocation, when done for its own sake, is probably always immoral. However, it’s interesting that in the case of the Pope’s speech, the basis for the Islamic provocation was precisely the lack of rationality which was the real topic of his speech, the grounding of theology and anthropology in monistic concepts and in the tyranny of emotional appeal, rather than in reason. In your play, this error is typified by Libby: the extremely liberal has a strange kinship with the extremely tyrannical: universalism, and relativism, being monistic concepts (one principle dominating all the rest), give way to tyranny.
In your play, Ben’s whispering behind Mo’s back, and Connie’s confrontation in group rather than in private, were probably wrong to do. In the real world version, Pope Benedict was not giving away his pearls to a wrong audience. Nor is there any hint of a provoking motive in his speech.
January 6th, 2008 at 8:08 pm
Tom,
Your anecdote is a great example of how “tolerance” is more than a social goal; it’s our civil religion. Intolerance isn’t considered rude, or uncouth, or distasteful–it’s heretical.
Paul,
I’m organizing my comments on your allegory.
January 6th, 2008 at 10:04 pm
An observer of this dialogue would have to conclude that no one is purely without fault. That being said, to conclude Mo is even of equal fault to the others is to say violence need only a feeling of being offended in order to be justified, which is of course preposterous.
January 9th, 2008 at 9:37 pm
The concept for this essay came to me in the week or so following the Pope’s speech. In one of the greatest moments of irony I’ve ever witnessed, Muslims around the world were demonstrating, often violently, in response to comments concerning Islam’s history of violence and its lack of rational introspection. When people blamed the Pope for causing Muslims to be angry, the idea of an angry-man dinner party guest popped into my head. I thought people would be able to think a little more clearly if the situation was placed in a different setting.
It seems unreasonable, and even ridiculous, to blame Ben, Connie, or Sam for Mo’s angry outburst and physical threats. I made the “speech” in the story a little more provocative than it was in real life for dramatic purposes, but it’s not all that provocative. A sane, untroubled person probably wouldn’t respond with physical threats when told he has an anger problem: he’d likely just deny that such was the case. Likewise, adherents of a religion not based on violence probably wouldn’t respond violently to charges that it was irrational and essentially violent: they would probably just deny that such was the case. It seems to me that a good deal of the blame for the escalated situation must lie with Muslim protesters, if not with Islam itself, in the same way that most of the blame in The Dinner Party for Mo’s outburst must lie with Mo and his anger problem.
April 3rd, 2008 at 8:35 am
[…] written before on this website about the Muslims who violently protest that their faith isn’t violent. While such responses […]